Compost Tea has become a very popular topic. The following is a quote from Fine Gardening (ref 2):
Gardeners all know compost is terrific stuff. But there’s something even better than plain old compost, and that’s compost tea. As the name implies, compost tea is made by steeping compost in water. It’s used as either a foliar spray or a soil drench, depending on where your plant has problems.
Why go to the extra trouble of brewing, straining, and spraying a tea rather than just working compost into the soil? There are several reasons. First, compost tea makes the benefits of compost go farther. What’s more, when sprayed on the leaves, compost tea helps suppress foliar diseases, increases the amount of nutrients available to the plant, and speeds the breakdown of toxins. Using compost tea has even been shown to increase the nutritional quality and improve the flavor of vegetables. If you’ve been applying compost to your soil only in the traditional way, you’re missing out on a whole host of benefits.
Letโs look at the facts.

What is Compost Tea?
This seems like a simple question, but it’s not. There is no clear definition of compost. Compost can be made from a large variety of materials, and each compost is different. If you make tea from two different types of compost you will get two different types of tea.
The nutrient content of each type of compost tea will be different.
One of the reported benefits of compost tea are the โmicrobesโ. If we assume this to be true then is it not important to know which microbes are in the tea? It certainly is. The problem is that unless you have a fairly sophisticated lab you wonโt know this. Home gardeners have no way to know which microbes are in their tea.
The microbe content of each type of tea will be different.
Tea can be made in two very different ways; aerobically and anaerobically. The term aerobic means that the tea is made in the presence of oxygen; you usually bubble air through the tea as it is brewing (see picture above). When tea is made anaerobically, it is made without added oxygen. You simply let the smelly sludge sit in a pail. The method used to make the tea is very important because microbes tend to favor one or other of these living conditions. They either like living with oxygen present or they prefer less oxygen. So the method you use to create the tea is very important to determine the type of microbes in the tea.
Aerobic soil bacteria inhabit soils that contain a lot of air; the light fluffy type of soil we all know to be good for plants. Anaerobic soil bacteria tend to live in wet, compacted clay type soils where there is little oxygen present – not the kind of soils we want. So why is it that many recipes for compost tea use the anaerobic method? That makes no sense and I can’t explain it.
There is also something called manure tea which is the same as compost tea except it is made from manure.
Bokashi composting is something completely different and is described in detail in Bokashi Composting Myths.
What Are the Benefits of Compost Tea?
Proponents of compost tea ascribe a wide range of benefits โ see the above quote from Fine Gardening.
One thing is clear to me. If a product or gardening technique does everything under the sun, it is always too good to be true. When it sounds like snake oil, it probably is snake oil! Run for the hills.
There are a few main benefits that would be worth discussing. Compost tea is claimed to provide:
- An increase in nutrients
- A decrease in diseases
- Additional microbes for the soil
A recent study compared AACT compost tea to using just compost and is described in Compost Tea – Does it Work?
Does Compost Tea Increase Nutrients?
To clarify the question it should be stated more clearly as; Does compost tea add more nutrients than compost alone? There is no doubt that compost tea adds nutrients. But does the process of making tea increase the level of nutrients compared to just using compost without brewing? If they both add the same amount of nutrients–why bother making tea?
If you think about it for 2 seconds you will realize that this is a silly notion. Think about what you are doing in making tea. You take a handful of compost and you put it in a bucket of water. Microbes take over and start digesting the compost.
Your original handful of compost had a certain amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. No matter what process you use, you will never increase the amount of these nutrients in a plastic bucket (except for some minor organics falling in an uncovered bucket). The microbes might breed and grow and digest things, but the total amount of nutrients remains the same. In fact it might actually be less since some of the nitrogen might be converted to ammonia which evaporates into the air.
What about the quoted statement above โcompost tea makes the benefits of compost go farther โ. The nutrient content (NPK fertilizer numbers) of say 500 ml of compost is 2.6 โ 0.9 โ 2 (average value for composted cattle manure; source Alberta Agriculture Department). If I now add this to a 5 gal pale (about 20 L), I still have the same ratio of nutrients, namely 2.6 โ 0.9 โ 24, but it is now diluted 40 times (500 ml to 20 L). The nutrient value of the tea is now 0.07 โ 0.02 โ 0.05. That is an extremely dilute fertilizer. For comparison human urine has a nutrient value of 11 โ 1 โ 2.5, that’s 160 times as much nitrogen as compost tea. Sure you can probably spread the tea over a larger area than a handful of compost, but if you do that the amount of nutrients added to the soil isย negligible โ so why bother??
The fact is that making tea from compost does not increase the amount of nutrients. It does not make the compost โgo furtherโ. If you want to add nutrients to the garden just add the compost directly.
In the post, Compost Tea NPK Values, I have a closer look at the NPK values and what manufacturers of the tea and kits for making tea have to say about their products.
Will Compost Tea Decrease Diseases?
This topic has been evaluated extensively, in reference #3 (link no longer valid). There are limited studies about disease reduction by compost tea, and the results are inconclusive.
The concept here is that the tea has a high concentration of microbes. When these are sprayed onto leaves they populate the surface of the leaves to such an extent that invading pathogenic microbes canโt take a hold. The good tea microbes out compete the potentially bad ones.
For this to work, the sprayed on microbes would need to colonize the leaves (ie live and breed on the leaves). This requires that the new environment, ie the leaf surface, has enough food for them and the oxygen levels are right for them.
Clearly, the oxygen levels would be high and so you can expect that anaerobic microbes would die out quickly. Anaerobic tea just won’t work.
The native microbes on plant surfaces are not well understood. There are anywhere from 1 to 10 million microbes on each 1 square centimeter of plant. Nobody knows what happens when more microbes are sprayed onto the leaf. I can’t help wondering why the large number of naturally occurring microbes can’t out compete the potentially bad ones and yet the ones sprayed on in the tea will do this??
In summary, there is little scientific evidence to support the idea that compost tea solves disease problems.
Does Compost Tea Add Microbes to the Soil?
There is no doubt this is true. You have a pail full of slimy microbes and if you spread it around the garden you are certainly adding microbes to the garden.
There is a new gardeningย trend of adding microbes to the soil under the assumption that the soil โneeds microbesโ. I’ve looked at this myth in more detail in the post Soil Microbes. In summary; the soil already has lots of microbes and adding a bit of tea is not going to make much of a difference.
If you are interested in identifying the microbes in tea you should read this before buying a microscope and taking Dr. Ingham’s course: Soil Bacteria – The Myth of Identification and Management.
The scientific study discussed in Compost Tea – Does it Work? clearly shows that adding microbes from AACT tea does not impact plant growth.
Can Compost Tea be Dangerous?
It is important to ask this question. Even if there are some minor benefits for using compost tea, they could be outweighed by risks.
Think about what you are doing when you make the tea. You are creating an incubator for microbes. You are providing the moisture, the food and the right oxygen levels to grow microbes. But which microbes are you growing? You have no idea know.
The reality is that along with the โgoodโ microbes you might also be growing โharmfulโ ones. You could be growing microbes that will make you or your plants sick. Tea that is aerated can contain Salmonella and E. coli both of which can prove to be deadly to humans. Remember the contaminated lettuce? That was E. coli contamination. You could also be growing microbes that are harmful to plants.
This study shows that adding molasses to increase the microbe populations can significantly increase the population of salmonella and E. Coli 0157.
The process for making compost tea is not selective – you grow whatever is in the pot.
I am confident that the risk is low. But why take the risk when the benefits of compost tea are at best, minimal?
Conclusion:
If you want to make some compost tea, go ahead. You will probably not harm anything and you just might have some fun doing it. But understand that there is currently no evidence that compost tea is any better than using just compost. Be a smart gardener and just spread the compost on the soil as a mulch. Nature will do the rest.
Further Comments:
This post now has quite a few comments. Many of them are from people with feelings about this topic but without any scientific evidence that their feelings are correct. If you have some references to discuss – please continue posting comments. If you have no valid references to support your position – don’t bother commenting, because I will not approve the comment.
For more information and explanations about the myths promoted by Dr. Ingham, have a look at these posts:
Teaming With Microbes – In Depth Book Review
Soil Bacteria โ The Myth of Identification and Management
Teaming with Microbes โ A Close Look, Part 1
Teaming with Microbes โ A Close Look, Part 2
References:
1) Application of Two Microbial Teas Did Not Affect Collard or Spinach Yield: http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/content/44/1/73.full
2) Brewing Compost Tea : http://www.finegardening.com/how-to/articles/brewing-compost-tea.aspx
3) Link no longer valid.
4) Photo source for Aerated Compost Tea: Lily Rhoads





The article makes perfect sense, actually dissuaded me from buying a bunch of tea mixes, garden hose filters, air pumps, and more stuff that I’m sure would be thrown into the cart. I love the spirit and the central idea of the post, and that is not to dissuade anyone from buying or not buying, but rather educate, so when I make a decision on how whether I want to have “fun” with this, it will be a much more informed decision after reading this, which is exactly what happened in my case.
Regarding this though… ” For comparison human urine has a nutrient value of 11 โ 1 โ 2.5, thatโs 160 times as much nitrogen as compost tea….”
I mean I have to ask now …. but would that be a good idea?
Using urine – yes it is a good idea, and much of the world does exactly that.
You really need to qualify this statement. It needs to be heavily diluted and even then salt based nitrogen sources are not necessarily the most beneficial form.
Which statement needs to be qualified? The statement “It needs to be heavily diluted ….” is not in the post.
False information my guy compost tea/ weed fertilizer tea help me over years with my small farm making my plants grow fuller and harvest plentiful. I also did a experiment between to of my plants and found out the plant that contained the compost/ weed fertilizer tea
out grew my plants without it. Plus all the time I have been doing it I have had no diseased plants or soil
You obviously missed the point of the article. No one says compost tea does not contain nutrients – it just does not contain more than the original compost.
“my plants and found out the plant that contained the compost/ weed fertilizer tea
out grew my plants without it.” – You made the classic mistake – you compared using nutrients to using water ie no nutrients. You have to compare tea with using the original compost.
Your classic mistake is that, sure one gets the same results using compost tea or compost, however one uses one tenth the amount of compost in compost tea.
That will never happen – making tea does not increase the nutrient level.
Look at all the previous comments – not one person has been able to provide a scientific study to show that.
Hi Robert, I am not a scientist so it is my opinion only.
I see worm/compost tea as the fastest way to get to the roots with all nutrients available in the tea. Compared to side dressing with compost and then watering it the tea is faster way to saturate entire medium with all those beneficial.
True – the tea is faster, but most of the nutrients are in the compost left behind – not in the tea.
Sir, the purpose of compost tea is to not feed the plant, it’s to feed organisms in soil by microbes multiplied with help of oxygen in brewing process. So let’s not look at compost and tea as plant fertilizer. It’s a soil fertilizer.
Thank you.
If that is your claim, then show me a study that compares compost tea with compost tea that has been sterilized. That will prove your point.
I have yet to see a study like show any difference.
Hi again,
I did not spend a lot of time on research but found this ( there was not a lot material on the topic) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1049964408003034
I have no idea if it proves my point of not. I’m not scientist just hobbyist.
Yet thank you for this conversation it made me to dig little bit deeper into “growing science”
This tested compost tea straight and sterilized which is the way you show a real effect. And the tea did show a reduction of Choanephora cucurbitarum on Okra.
The abstract does not indicate how much of a reduction it was, but did say it was statistically significant.
It also found that the effect was short lived, so to control the fungus the plant needs to be sprayed on a continual basis.
These results can’t be extrapolated to other diseases and other plants.
Dear Mr Pavlis, in the interests of transparency and full-disclosure, would you please provide a list of the sources from which you receive funding? Is it only your books or do you receive funds and/or materials from companies, grants, agencies, or individuals?
Thank you sir; your passion for this subject matter is commendable.
I don’t get funding from anyone.
I sell my books, and get a small amount of revenue from ads on YouTube.
Iโm baffled by the amount of time you have spent arguing this topic. NPK is not the end all be all and the concept of aact is not to increase the npk value, obviously this is not going to happen, it is as stated 1 million times above to rapidly increase the bacteria and yes fungal populations, depending on feed stock to your rhizosphere. Of course short of a lab behind you, the average gardener can only judge benefits through side by side trials. Just because you dump 100lbs of nitrogen or phosphate onto your soil, does not mean it will all be readily available by the time your crops need them, or that your in anyway helping your soil. I donโt understand your point, unless it is stating there is no benefit of feeding the ecosystem in which your plants exist and more less advocating turning a field into a soiless media. In a perfect world, with the perfect soil mix, your not going to notice much, but if your trying to rapidly feed your rhizosphere from time to time there are benefits of adding aact, particularly with fast growing crops. I do give you kuddos on your one upsmanship however. Long live big AG.
But adding microbes to soil does not work.
Show me one study that shows tea is better than the material used to make the tea.
I checked the Fine Gardening reference, which is actually entitled “The Jury Is Still Out on Compost Tea,” and argues for skepticism on compost tea claims. It doesn’t contain the text you quote. Has the link changed since the original post? Has Fine Gardening reconsidered its claims?
I fixed this and did a little grammar editing, if youโre not going to publish my comment and answer could you please just answer me in an email?
Iโm just baffled by this theory of yours…..
ChadWemple@hotmail.com
Iโve read this article a few times and took a different approach when gauging the benefits of worm casting or compost tea.
I often thought to myself, is this really providing any benefits?
Rather than arguing theories I decided to put the old term proof is in the pudding to the test โฆ.
Simply put, I put eight plants on the same regimen with the only difference being rather than adding the worm castings straight to the planter of medium prior to planting and on the other of course put In an aerated container with molasses prior to watering said plants..
Along with a few variations,
Pretty simple!
The results are something this farmboy can take to the bank!
There is no way after seeing the results of plants given the worm casting tea versus not that I would ever dream of depriving any intended crop from the benefits of compost and worm casting tea!
I have even done tests comparing worm castings sourced from vegan fed worms and castings sourced from manure fed wormsโฆ
The worm castings sourced from manure were outperfarmed (that misspellings a joke) by the castings sourced by vegan fed worms underlining my Theory that manure fed worm castings are colonized not only with beneficial microbes but also a large number of non-beneficialโฆ
So can you please explain to me why the plants given vegan fed worm casting tea outperformed the manure fed worm casting tea plants, and the plants given standard manure fed worm casting tea outperformed the plants with the worm castings only added to the planter medium and last but not least the plants not given any worm castings or compost castings looks like a scrawny scarecrow compared to the robust plants given vegan fed worm casting teaโฆ
These differences were significant and my intention was to prove to myself that I can stop making tea..
I was wrong!
Please explain why I experienced these results if worm casting tea does not provide any significant benefits but I can visually see the difference and itโs dramatic!
So you compared two different teas.
1) What was the NPK of each tea?
2) How did ensure the same volume was added to both test samples?
3) What is the data you collected to make the comparison?
Robert; I realize you are tired of replying here. I actually came to your page researching cinnamon extracts for anti-fungals. I am the author/researcher of Microbe Organics. If you did read everything you would have found I stated that there is not much difference between using [v]compost and ACT, except I found through ACT I could use at least 80% less [v]compost with ACT.
Our supply of [v]compost was limited; like gold.
i was fortunate to have a farm and laboratory. We made ACT with multiple airlifts in a 4500 litre tank. The ACT was pumped through our irrigation system to about 800 feet of garden beds. This was pretty much all we used outside of occasionally dumping 10 gallons of fish hydrolysate into water to pump out.
Worked for 12 years and kept some families fed and paid. I won’t get into details here but feel free to email me.
Your logic is extremely flawed. Matter and elements are neither created or destroyed, but elements do not equal nutrients. Microbes can definitely synthesize new nutrients from raw materials, including amino acids, sugars, lipids, vitamins, etc… And microbes need water to live. I have no dog in this fight, but I hate when someone claims “science” and misapplies it.
No they can’t! Amino acids are not plant nutrients.
It is true that microbes can make amino acids, but these are made from plant nutrients like nitrogen, sulfur, carbon and oxygen. By making amino acids the total amount of nutrients has not changed. There is no additional sulfur in the pot when microbes make amino acids.
https://www.gardenmyths.com/trace-mineral-fertilizers-how-many-nutrients-plants-need/
Elements do not equal nutrients. If you’re talking specifically plants and not the ecosystem of a garden, consider nitrate consumed directly by “plants.” The are a finite number of Ns and On in the bucket, but the number of nitrates produced by microbes can definitely increase. Lock me in a warehouse with bread and jelly and no sandwiches and I can still make sandwiches. Btw most amino acids do not contain sulfur. Again I have no idea if compost tea works and this blog post didn’t sway me in either direction because it is fundamentally flawed.
I never said elements equal nutrients. Some amino acids do contain sulfur – cysteine for example.
Yes microbes could make more nitrates, but so what. The total amount of nitrogen available to plants, either short term or long term does not change.
The post is not flawed.
My personal experience of using compost tea has been with indoor grown plants under lights. The pots are filled with a mixture of sterile potting compost and vermiculite. When I’ve added either compost tea or commercially produced microbe additives there has been significantly stronger root growth and higher yields. While this might not be the perfect controlled lab conditions the difference between with or without any added microbes is noticeable both in plant health and size of crop. I’d strongly recommend it to anyone planting in grow bags or with similar sterile potting medium.
How did you measure root growth?
How did you measure yield?
How many duplicates did you use?
So far the information you presented is just anecdotal with no “controlled conditions” at all. If you did do controlled experiments. please provide the data.
So far the comment is just an example of how myths get perpetuated.